4.3 Article

Time-varying meshing stiffness calculation of an internal gear pair with small tooth number difference by considering the multi-tooth contact problem

期刊

JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 35, 期 9, 页码 4073-4083

出版社

KOREAN SOC MECHANICAL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1007/s12206-021-0819-2

关键词

Analytical method; Finite element-analytical method; Internal gear pair with small tooth number difference; Time-varying mesh stiffness

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [92048201]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes two methods for calculating the time-varying meshing stiffness in internal gear pairs with small tooth difference, including establishing an analytical model using the potential energy method and applying a hybrid finite element-analytical method. These two methods are validated by the finite element method, with results showing that the finite element-analytical method is closer to the reference results.
Due to the multiple tooth contact problem involving internal gear pair with small tooth number difference (IGPSTND), the existing analytical methods applied for standard spur or helix gear pairs to calculate the time-varying meshing stiffness (TVMS) are not suitable. In this paper, two methods are proposed for calculating the time-varying meshing stiffness in internal gear pairs with small tooth difference. In the first method, an analytical model is established by using the potential energy method, considering the clearance of initial contact tooth and the external load. The second method proposes the application of a hybrid finite element-analytical method. The proposed two methods are validated by the application of the finite element method. By taking the results of finite element analysis as a comparative reference, the results show that the finite element - analytical method is closer to the reference results than the results obtained by the analytical method, and both methods are less computationally expensive than finite element analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据