4.7 Article

Deciphering the dynamics of glomalin and heavy metals in soils contaminated with hazardous municipal solid wastes

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 416, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125869

关键词

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi; Glomalin related soil protein; Solid wastes; Heavy metals; Soil organic carbon

资金

  1. NER Twinning, Department of Biotechnology, Government of India [BT/PR16795/NER/95/292/2015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study examined the bio-stabilization of heavy metals in contaminated soils by GRSP produced by AMF, and found that GRSP showed weak positive correlation with essential elements like zinc and copper, weak positive correlation with toxic elements like cadmium and nickel, and negative correlation with chromium and manganese.
Heavy metals (HMs) accumulation in the soils poses risks towards the environment and health. Glomalin related soil protein (GRSP) produced by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) has metal-sorption and soil aggregation properties and is critical in the survival of plants and AMF. For the first time, this study attempted to examine the GRSP mediated bio-stabilization of HMs in soils contaminated with municipal solid wastes (MSW). The content and interrelationship of GRSP and HMs, along with soil physicochemical properties were studied in 20 different soil samples from the dumping site. Higher amount of GRSP indicated potential bio-stabilization of HMs at some sites. GRSP exhibited weak positive correlation with essential (Zn, Cu) and toxic HMs (Cd, Ni). Cr and Mn were possibly sequestered in AMF structures and thus found to be negatively correlated with GRSP. The positive correlation observed between GRSP and soil nutrients like N, P and soil organic carbon (SOC) indicating potential of AMF-GRSP in sustaining soil health. Results revealed that AMF residing at contaminated sites produced higher amount of GRSP potentially to bio-stabilize the HMs, and reduce their bioavailability and also facilitate SOC sequestration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据