4.6 Article

Low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols diet versus traditional dietary advice for functional dyspepsia: a randomized controlled trial

期刊

JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
卷 37, 期 2, 页码 301-309

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15694

关键词

bloating; disorders of gut-brain interaction; epigastric pain syndrome; functional gastro-intestinal disorder; post-prandial distress syndrome

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that both low FODMAP diet and traditional dietary advice lead to significant improvement in symptoms and quality of life in patients with functional dyspepsia. Patients with postprandial distress syndrome or bloating responded significantly better to the low FODMAP diet. Therefore, dietary advice for functional dyspepsia should be tailored to the subtype of the condition.
Background and Aim Prospective trials evaluating efficacy of specific diet restriction in functional dyspepsia (FD) are scarce. We aimed to assess efficacy of low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAP) diet in FD, compared with traditional dietary advice (TDA). Methods In this prospective, single-blind trial, patients with FD (Rome IV) were randomized into low FODMAP diet (LFD) and TDA groups, for 4 weeks (phase I). In phase II (4-12 weeks), LFD group was advised systematic re-introduction of FODMAPs. Symptom severity and quality of life were assessed using Short-Form Nepean Dyspepsia Index (SF-NDI). Primary outcome was symptomatic response (symptom score reduction of >= 50%), at 4 weeks. Study was registered with CTRI (2019/06/019852). Results Of 184 patients screened, 105 were randomized to LFD (n = 54) and TDA (n = 51) groups. At 4 weeks, both groups showed significant reduction in SF-NDI symptom scores compared with baseline, with no significant difference in inter-group response rates [LFD: 66.7% (36/54); TDA: 56.9% (29/51); P = 0.32]. On sub-group analysis, patients with postprandial distress syndrome or bloating had significantly better symptomatic response with LFD (P = 0.04). SF-NDI quality of life scores improved significantly in both groups. On multivariate analysis, factors predicting response to LFD were bloating and male gender. Incidences of adverse events (minor) were similar in both groups. Conclusions In patients with FD, LFD and TDA lead to significant symptomatic and quality of life improvement. Patients with postprandial distress syndrome or bloating respond significantly better to LFD. Therefore, dietary advice for FD should be individualized according to FD subtype.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据