4.6 Article

The essential role of food composition databases for public health nutrition-Experiences from the Netherlands

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2021.103967

关键词

Food composition database; Public health nutrition; Nutrient intake; The Netherlands

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Public health nutrition involves promoting the nutrition-related health of populations, with food composition databases playing a crucial role in the Assessment, Analyses, and Action phases. Keeping these databases up-to-date and of good quality is essential for effective public health nutrition efforts.
Public health nutrition is the promotion of nutrition-related health of populations. This paper aims to show the essential role of food composition databases for public health nutrition using examples from the Netherlands, and to point to gaps and needs for the future. Food composition databases play a role in the Assessment, Analyses and Action phases of public health nutrition. An important activity in the Assessment phase is the identification of nutrients for which intake is too low or too high. Moreover, food composition databases are needed to Analyse the dietary problems; for example to identify the main food sources of nutrients for which intake is too high. In the Action phase, food composition data are among others used to inform consumers about the nutritional content of foods. Gaps and needs for food composition databases are related to the rapidly changing food markets and to new nutritional and health interests. ICT developments and the availability of branded food databases provide new opportunities and challenges. Additionally, there is a need for continued improvement of international harmonisation of food composition databases to enable international research and comparisons. In conclusion, national food composition databases are essential for public health nutrition. A constant effort is needed to keep them up-to-date and of good quality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据