4.7 Article

Effect of pesticide residues in grapes on alcoholic fermentation and elimination of chlorothalonil inhibition by chlorothalonil hydrolytic dehalogenase

期刊

FOOD CONTROL
卷 64, 期 -, 页码 70-76

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.12.028

关键词

Pesticide residues; Grape slurry; Alcoholic fermentation; Chlorothalonil hydrolytic dehalogenase (Chd); Eliminating inhibition

资金

  1. Chinese National Science Foundation for Excellent Young Scholars [31222003]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [KJQN201645]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2014M561660]
  4. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2013AA102804]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of different kinds of pesticide residues in grapes on alcoholic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae was evaluated. Among four types of pesticides added into the grape slurry, omethoate, triadimefon and cyhalothrin did not inhibit the alcoholic fermentation at their proposed spraying concentration of 0.21, 0.10 and 0.10 g L-1, respectively, whereas chlorothalonil concentration above 0.03 g L-1 behaved significantly negative influence on both S. cerevisiae growth and alcoholic fermentation efficiency. When the chlorothalonil concentration was lower than 0.01 g L-1, the fermentation proceeded smoothly without any degradation of chlorothalonil. Considering the cumulative toxicity and adverse effect of chlorothalonil on fermentation, chlorothalonil hydrolytic dehalogenase (Chd) extracellularly expressed from the recombinant Bacillus subtilis WB800 was used to pretreat the chlorothalonilcontaminated grape slurry. After treatment by the Chd enzyme in an activity of 7.25 mU L-1 slurry for 60 min, the inhibition effect could be substantially eliminated even at an initial concentration of 0.10 g L-1 chlorothalonil. This study provides a potential approach for solving the conflict in fermentation industry with pesticides inhibition. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据