4.3 Article

Consensus for experimental design in electromyography (CEDE) project: Terminology matrix

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2021.102565

关键词

Electromyography; Recording; Terminology; Consensus

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia [APP1091302]
  2. European Research Council [ERC2014CoG646923]
  3. Irish Research Council [EPSPD/2020/108]
  4. NHMRC [APP1102905, APP1132524, APP1153439, APP1156093]
  5. University of Queensland Research Training Scholarship
  6. Slovenian Research Agency [J2-1731, L7-9421, P20041]
  7. Institut Universitaire de France (IUF)
  8. European Research Council (ERC) [810346]
  9. Royal Society (Wolfson Research Merit Award)
  10. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P20041] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a matrix developed within the Consensus for Experimental Design in Electromyography (CEDE) project, providing definitions for terms used in the EMG literature. The definitions for physiological and technical terms that are common in EMG research are included in two tables, with key information on each definition provided in a comment section.
Consensus on the definition of common terms in electromyography (EMG) research promotes consistency in the EMG literature and facilitates the integration of research across the field. This paper presents a matrix developed within the Consensus for Experimental Design in Electromyography (CEDE) project, providing definitions for terms used in the EMG literature. The definitions for physiological and technical terms that are common in EMG research are included in two tables, with key information on each definition provided in a comment section. A brief outline of some basic principles for recording and analyzing EMG is included in an appendix, to provide researchers new to EMG with background and context for understanding the definitions of physiological and technical terms. This terminology matrix can be used as a reference to aid researchers new to EMG in reviewing the EMG literature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据