4.3 Article

A time series analysis of immune checkpoint inhibitor use in the United States Medicare population: 2014-2019

期刊

JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL TREATMENT
卷 33, 期 4, 页码 2004-2007

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2021.1962002

关键词

Immunotherapy; immune checkpoint inhibitors; Medicare; cost-effectiveness; value-based payment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The utilization of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has rapidly increased in the US Medicare population from 2014 to 2019, leading to a significant growth in government drug spending. ICIs accounted for a disproportionate share of the overall increase in Medicare Part B drug spending during this time period. Policymakers may be able to control spending growth by tying payments to patient outcomes.
Background The adoption of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has dramatically transformed the treatment of numerous cancers. Medicare is the largest payer in the US and pays for physician-administered drugs through its medical Part B benefit. The aim of this study was to describe trends in ICI utilization and corresponding government expenditures within the US Medicare population. Methods We analyzed Medicare data to describe trends in total number of claims, total annual expenditures, expenditures per patient, and expenditures per claim for ICIs from January 2014 to December 2019. Results From 2014 to 2019, utilization rates for each of the seven market approved ICIs in the US increased. Over this time period, total Medicare expenditure on ICIs increased 1916% from $285,506,498 to $5,755,319,571. Concurrently, overall Medicare Part B drug expenditure increased 57% from $23,679,547,748 to $37,271,080,631. Expenditures on ICIs accounted for 40% of the increase in total Medicare Part B drug spending over this time period. Conclusions The rapid increase in utilization of ICIs has accounted for a disproportionate share of government drug spending growth in the United States. Policymakers can potentially curb spending growth by linking payments to patient outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据