4.8 Review

Treating colon cancers with a non-conventional yet strategic approach: An overview of various nanoparticulate systems

期刊

JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE
卷 336, 期 -, 页码 16-39

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.06.008

关键词

Colon cancer; Nanoparticles; Oncotherapeutics; Colon-specific drug delivery

资金

  1. Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), New Delhi [EMR/2016/003893]
  2. Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi [45/15/2020-Nan/BMS]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanoparticles show promise in colon-specific drug delivery for colon cancer, offering flexibility in design, drug release modulation, and cancer cell targeting. While they have the potential to revolutionize cancer therapy and vaccine development, challenges remain in effectively delivering drugs to the colon using nanoparticles.
Regardless of progress in therapy management which are developed for colon cancer (CC), it remains the third most common cause of mortality due to cancers around the world. Conventional medicines pose side effects due to untoward action on non-target cells. Their inability to deliver drugs to the affected regions of the colon locally, in a reproducible manner raises a concern towards the efficacy of therapy. In this regard, nanoparticles emerged as a promising drug delivery system due to their flexibility in designing, drug release modulation and cancer cell targeting. Not only are nanoparticles making their way into colon cancer research in the revolution of conventional onco-therapeutics, but they also offer promising scope in the development of colon cancer vaccines and theranostic tools. However, there are challenges with respect to drug delivery using nanoparticles, which may hamper the delivery of these novel carriers to the colon. The present review addresses recent advents in nano technology for colon-specific drug delivery (CDDS) which may help to overcome the existing challenges and intends to recognize futuristic potentials in the treatment of CC with CDDS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据