Hypothetical case replacement can be used to quantify the robustness of trial results
出版年份 2021 全文链接
标题
Hypothetical case replacement can be used to quantify the robustness of trial results
作者
关键词
Robustness of findings, Randomized controlled trials, Fragility, Case replacement, Statistical significance, Clinical importance
出版物
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 134, Issue -, Pages 150-159
出版商
Elsevier BV
发表日期
2021-03-18
DOI
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.01.025
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Against pandemic research exceptionalism
- (2020) Alex John London et al. SCIENCE
- Evidence-based medicine in times of crisis
- (2020) Benjamin Djulbegovic et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- The fragility of trial results involves more than statistical significance alone
- (2020) Stephen D. Walter et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- The regional pattern of abnormal cerebrovascular reactivity in HIV-infected, virally suppressed women
- (2020) Andrew L. Callen et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROVIROLOGY
- Trends and relevance in the bladder and bowel dysfunction literature: PlumX metrics contrasted with fragility indicators
- (2020) Mandy Rickard et al. Journal of Pediatric Urology
- The statistical significance of meta-analyses is frequently fragile: definition of a fragility index for meta-analyses
- (2019) Ignacio Atal et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- New Guidelines for Statistical Reporting in the Journal
- (2019) David Harrington et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Making sense of sensitivity: extending omitted variable bias
- (2019) Carlos Cinelli et al. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY
- Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trials
- (2018) Angus Deaton et al. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
- The tribulations of trials: A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright
- (2018) J. Michael Oakes SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
- The Fragility Index in Randomized Clinical Trials as a Means of Optimizing Patient Care
- (2018) Christopher J. Tignanelli et al. JAMA Surgery
- The minimal clinically important difference raised the significance of outcome effects above the statistical level, with methodological implications for future studies
- (2017) Felix Angst et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Nonprice incentives and energy conservation
- (2015) Omar I. Asensio et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Altruism, self-interest, and energy consumption
- (2015) Thomas Dietz PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- US climate policy needs behavioural science
- (2015) Amanda R. Carrico et al. Nature Climate Change
- How well do health professionals interpret diagnostic information? A systematic review
- (2015) Penny F Whiting et al. BMJ Open
- The statistical significance of randomized controlled trial results is frequently fragile: a case for a Fragility Index
- (2014) Michael Walsh et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Visual representation of statistical information improves diagnostic inferences in doctors and their patients
- (2013) Rocio Garcia-Retamero et al. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
- GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence
- (2011) Howard Balshem et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Translating statistical findings into plain English
- (2009) Stuart J Pocock et al. LANCET
- Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes
- (2007) Dennis Revicki et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started