Factors promoting shared decision-making in renal replacement therapy for patients with end-stage kidney disease: systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis
出版年份 2021 全文链接
标题
Factors promoting shared decision-making in renal replacement therapy for patients with end-stage kidney disease: systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis
作者
关键词
-
出版物
INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
出版商
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
发表日期
2021-06-23
DOI
10.1007/s11255-021-02913-8
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017
- (2020) Boris Bikbov et al. LANCET
- The global burden of chronic kidney disease
- (2020) Paul Cockwell et al. LANCET
- Patients’ experiences of transitioning between different renal replacement therapy modalities: A qualitative study
- (2020) Els Holvoet et al. PERITONEAL DIALYSIS INTERNATIONAL
- Renal Replacement Knowledge and Preferences for African Americans With Chronic Kidney Disease
- (2020) Akilah King et al. Journal of Renal Care
- Shared decision‐making in dialysis choice has potential to improve self‐management in people with kidney disease: A qualitative follow‐up study
- (2020) Jeanette Finderup et al. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING
- Family dynamics in a multi-ethnic Asian society: comparison of elderly CKD patients and their family caregivers experience with medical decision making for managing end stage kidney disease
- (2019) Semra Ozdemir et al. BMC Nephrology
- Perspectives on decision making amongst older people with end‐stage renal disease and caregivers in Singapore: A qualitative study
- (2019) Emeline Han et al. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS
- Qualitative evidence to improve guidelines and health decision-making
- (2018) Etienne V Langlois et al. BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
- How perceived feelings of “wellness” influence the decision-making of people with predialysis chronic kidney disease
- (2018) Sandra Campbell-Crofts et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING
- Decision-making experiences of patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) regarding treatment in Ghana: a qualitative study
- (2018) Edward Appiah Boateng et al. BMC Nephrology
- Difficult conversations: Australian Indigenous patients’ views on kidney transplantation
- (2017) Jeannie Devitt et al. BMC Nephrology
- Coping with kidney disease – qualitative findings from the Empowering Patients on Choices for Renal Replacement Therapy (EPOCH-RRT) study
- (2017) Lalita Subramanian et al. BMC Nephrology
- To dialyse or delay: a qualitative study of older New Zealanders’ perceptions and experiences of decision-making, with stage 5 chronic kidney disease
- (2017) Sarah Lovell et al. BMJ Open
- Patient Perspectives on the Choice of Dialysis Modality: Results From the Empowering Patients on Choices for Renal Replacement Therapy (EPOCH-RRT) Study
- (2016) Claudia Dahlerus et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES
- The global burden of chronic kidney disease: estimates, variability and pitfalls
- (2016) Richard J. Glassock et al. Nature Reviews Nephrology
- Selection of peritoneal dialysis among older eligible patients with end-stage renal disease
- (2016) Ben Wong et al. NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
- The Experience of Older People in the Shared Decision-Making Process in Advanced Kidney Care
- (2016) Nicola Thomas et al. Biomed Research International
- Understanding by Older Patients of Dialysis and Conservative Management for Chronic Kidney Failure
- (2015) Sarah Tonkin-Crine et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES
- Patient and Health Care Professional Decision-Making to Commence and Withdraw from Renal Dialysis: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Research
- (2015) J. A. Hussain et al. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
- Patient Acceptability of the Yorkshire Dialysis Decision Aid (YoDDA) Booklet: A Prospective Non-Randomized Comparison Study Across 6 Predialysis Services
- (2015) A. E. Winterbottom et al. PERITONEAL DIALYSIS INTERNATIONAL
- Healthcare decision-making in end stage renal disease-patient preferences and clinical correlates
- (2015) Anuradha Jayanti et al. BMC Nephrology
- Patient and caregiver preferences for home dialysis--the home first study: a protocol for qualitative interviews and discrete choice experiments
- (2015) R. C. Walker et al. BMJ Open
- A methodological systematic review of what’s wrong with meta-ethnography reporting
- (2014) Emma F France et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Dialysis modality decision-making for older adults with chronic kidney disease
- (2014) Lori Harwood et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING
- Where Is the Evidence? A Systematic Review of Shared Decision Making and Patient Outcomes
- (2014) L. Aubree Shay et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- Opting out of dialysis - Exploring patients' decisions to forego dialysis in favour of conservative non-dialytic management for end-stage renal disease
- (2013) Angeline S. T. Seah et al. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS
- Selecting renal replacement therapies: what do African American and non-African American patients and their families think others should know? A mixed methods study
- (2013) Nicole DePasquale et al. BMC Nephrology
- Choosing dialysis modality: decision making in a chronic illness context
- (2012) Anna Winterbottom et al. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS
- Religious Beliefs and Practices in End-Stage Renal Disease: Implications for Clinicians
- (2012) Barbara A. Elliott et al. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT
- Patient Views About Treatment of Stage 5 CKD: A Qualitative Analysis of Semistructured Interviews
- (2010) Rachael L. Morton et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES
- Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: Lessons learnt
- (2008) Salla Atkins et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started