4.5 Article

A novel multimodality anatomical image fusion method based on contrast and structure extraction

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ima.22649

关键词

fast guided filter; local contrast; medical image fusion; salient structure; weight map

资金

  1. National Center of Robotics and Automation, Pakistan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article introduces a novel weighted term multimodality anatomical medical image fusion method, which eliminates distortions and extracts crucial information to produce a high-quality fused image.
Image modalities, such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and so on, reflect various levels of details about objects of interest that help medical practitioners to examine patients' diseases from different perspectives. A single medical image, at times, may not be sufficient for making a critical decision; therefore, providing detailed information from a different perspective may help in making a better decision. Image fusion techniques play a vital role in this regard by combining important details from different medical images into a single, information enhanced image. In this article, we present a novel weighted term multimodality anatomical medical image fusion method. The proposed method, as a first step, eliminates the distortions from the source images and afterward, extracts two pieces of crucial information: the local contrast and the salient structure. Both the local contrast and salient structure are later combined to obtain the final weight map. The obtained weights are then passed through a fast guided filter to remove the discontinuities and noise. Lastly, the refined weight map is fused with source images using pyramid decomposition to get the final fused image. The proposed method is accessed and compared both qualitatively and quantitatively with state-of-the-art techniques. The result illustrates the performance superiority and efficiency of the proposed method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据