4.3 Article

Heavy metals in sediments of an urban river at the vicinity of tannery industries in Bangladesh: a preliminary study for ecological and human health risk

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/03067319.2021.1977288

关键词

Sediment; heavy metals; concentration; ecological risk; health risk; tannery area

资金

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University [R.G.P.2/33/42]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study revealed varying concentrations of heavy metals in sediments of an urban river, with high levels of contamination for cadmium and chromium. Furthermore, both ecological risk and health risk assessments indicated significant contamination of cadmium and chromium in the sediments.
This study was conducted to measure the concentration of heavy metals and to examine their allied ecological and health risk from the sediments of an urban river adjacent to the tannery industrial park. In this study, atomic absorption spectrophotometer was used to quantify the concentration of lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), copper (Cu), chromium (Cr), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), nickel (Ni) and zinc (Zn) in sediments. The mean concentrations of Pb, Cd, Cu, Cr, Fe, Mn, Ni and Zn in sediments were 15.4, 0.73, 6.8, 64.7, 305.2, 19.9, 18.2 and 7.3 mg/kg, respectively. According to the Sediment Quality Guideline, sediments from Dhaleshwari River were not polluted by Pb, Cu, Mn and Zn but moderately polluted by Cd and Ni and heavily polluted with Cr and Fe. Moreover, sediment contamination factor (CF), pollution load index (PLI) and geo-accumulation index (I-geo) demonstrated that sediments from the study river were heavily contaminated by Cd and Cr. Furthermore, potential ecological risk showed high risk of Cd and Cr. Hazard quotient (HQ) and Hazard index (HI) values showed heavily contaminated for Cr and moderately contaminated for Pb for both adult and children. In view of the potential non-carcinogenic human health risk showed heavily contaminated for Cr and moderately contaminated for Pb in this study area.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据