4.6 Article

3D numerical modeling and experimental validation of machining Nomex® honeycomb materials

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-021-07336-4

关键词

Honeycomb structure; Composite; Nomex (R); Machining; Hashin and Tsai-Wu failure criteria

资金

  1. Evatec-tools group
  2. National French Research Agency (ANR)
  3. LARIOPAC Labcom project [ANR-13-LAB2-0002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Machining of Nomex(R) honeycomb materials is a significant challenge in the industry due to the complex geometry of the honeycomb structure and the difficulties associated with the thin walls of the material. Numerical modeling using different orthotropic approaches and failure criteria helps to understand the machining process. The interaction between the cutting tool and the honeycomb walls, as well as the different stages of chip formation, are carefully modeled and validated through experiments.
Machining of Nomex (R) honeycomb materials is the biggest challenge in industry because of the complex forms and geometry of the honeycomb structure. The latter is characterized by a low density with orthotropic mechanical behavior. The thin walls of the composite structure make the shaping of this material very difficult. Studying interactions between the cutting tool and material, cutting forces, and chip formation allow to understand the machining process of Nomex (R) honeycomb. This paper presents 3D numerical modeling of machining Nomex (R) honeycomb using different orthotropic approaches and failure criteria: (i) monolayer isotropic approach, (ii) monolayer orthotropic approach with Tsai-Wu failure criteria, and (iii) monolayer orthotropic approach with Hashin failure criteria. A comparison between experiments and numerical cutting forces was performed to validate the proposed model. The interaction between the tool and the honeycomb walls, which make it possible to observe the different stages of the chip formation process, was carefully modeled.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据