4.8 Article

Microbiota-derived acetate activates intestinal innate immunity via the Tip60 histone acetyltransferase complex

期刊

IMMUNITY
卷 54, 期 8, 页码 1683-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2021.05.017

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R21 AI109436, R01 AI162701]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microbe-derived acetate activates the IMD pathway in a subset of enteroendocrine cells in the anterior midgut of Drosophila. This pathway co-regulates expression of antimicrobial and enteroendocrine peptides, including a repressor of intestinal lipid synthesis. Acetate appears to enhance IMD signaling through the monocarboxylic acid transporter Tarag and histone deacetylation in enteroendocrine cells. Tip60-dependent chromatin remodeling modulates host metabolism and intestinal innate immunity via a steroid hormone axis conserved in mammals.
Microbe-derived acetate activates the Drosophila immunodeficiency (IMD) pathway in a subset of enteroendocrine cells (EECs) of the anterior midgut. In these cells, the IMD pathway co-regulates expression of antimicrobial and enteroendocrine peptides including tachykinin, a repressor of intestinal lipid synthesis. To determine whether acetate acts on a cell surface pattern recognition receptor or an intracellular target, we asked whether acetate import was essential for IMD signaling. Mutagenesis and RNA interference revealed that the putative monocarboxylic acid transporter Tarag was essential for enhancement of IMD signaling by dietary acetate. Interference with histone deacetylation in EECs augmented transcription of genes regulated by the steroid hormone ecdysone including IMD targets. Reduced expression of the histone acetyltransferase Tip60 decreased IMD signaling and blocked rescue by dietary acetate and other sources of intracellular acetyl-CoA. Thus, microbe-derived acetate induces chromatin remodeling within enteroendocrine cells, co-regulating host metabolism and intestinal innate immunity via a Tip60-steroid hormone axis that is conserved in mammals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据