4.4 Article

Seventy-Year Retrospective on Size-Structure Changes in the Recreational Fisheries of Wisconsin

期刊

FISHERIES
卷 41, 期 5, 页码 230-243

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1080/03632415.2016.1160894

关键词

-

资金

  1. Federal Aid in Sportfish Restoration, Study SSPF [WI F-95-P]
  2. National Science Foundation [DEB-1440297]
  3. NTL-LTER
  4. United States Geological Survey National Climate Change and Wildlife Science Center grant [10909172]
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences
  6. Division Of Environmental Biology [1440297] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To identify past successes and future opportunities for improved fisheries management in Wisconsin, we synthesized size-structure information on 19 gamefish species from 1944 to 2012, incorporating data on more than 2 million measured individuals. Since the 1940s, mean and mean maximum sizes of five gamefish species (Lake Sturgeon Acipenser fulvescens, Largemouth Bass Micropterus salmoides, Smallmouth Bass M. dolomieu, Northern Pike Esox lucius, and Sauger Sander canadensis) have stayed fairly stable, and one (Muskellunge E. masquinongy) initially dropped and then reboundedmost likely as a product of increased catch-and-release fishing and restrictive harvest regulations. In contrast, four panfish species (i.e., Bluegill Lepomis macrochirus, Green L. cyanellus, Yellow Perch Perca flavescens, and Black Crappie Pomoxis nigromaculatus), which have not received the same conservation management attention, have experienced substantial and sustained erosions in size over the same period. Regulations for many species and species complexes have been cyclical over time, illustrating the challenge of consistently managing fisheries. Our long-term retrospective analysis was effective at identifying new opportunities for improved fisheries management in Wisconsin (i.e., panfish management). We therefore encourage other big data retrospective approaches within and across regions to identify past successes and future opportunities in other fisheries management programs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据