4.7 Article

An Efficient Calibration Method for Triaxial Gyroscope

期刊

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
卷 21, 期 18, 页码 19896-19903

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2021.3100589

关键词

Gyroscopes; Calibration; Estimation; Sensors; Magnetometers; Magnetic resonance imaging; Computational complexity; Angular velocity; calibration; experimental design; gyroscopes; parameter estimation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, an efficient servomotor-aided calibration method for the triaxial gyroscope is proposed, which improves calibration accuracy and computational efficiency through a six-observation experimental design and a fast converging linear least square estimation method. Experimental results demonstrate the feasibility and accuracy of the method.
This paper presents an efficient servomotor-aided calibration method for the triaxial gyroscope. The entire calibration process only requires approximately one minute, and does not require high-precision equipment. This method is based on the idea that the measurement of the gyroscope should be equal to the rotation speed of the servomotor. A six-observation experimental design is proposed to minimize the maximum variance of the estimated scale factors and biases. In addition, a fast converging recursive linear least square estimation method is presented to reduce computational complexity. The simulation results reflect the robustness of the calibration method under normal and extreme conditions. We experimentally demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed method on a robot arm, and implement the method on a microcontroller. We verify the calibration results of the proposed method by comparing with a traditional turntable approach, and the experiment indicates that the results of these two methods are comparable. By comparing the calibrated low-cost gyroscope reading with the reading from a high-precision gyroscope, we can conclude that our method significantly increases the gyroscope's accuracy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据