4.6 Article

Poor feeding opportunities and reduced condition factor for salmon post-smolts in the Northeast Atlantic Ocean

期刊

ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE
卷 78, 期 8, 页码 2844-2857

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsab163

关键词

amphipoda; climate change; fish larvae; mackerel; Norwegian Sea

资金

  1. Research Council of Norway [280308]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study shows a decrease in condition factor and stomach fullness of post-smolts in the Norwegian Sea over the past decade, mainly due to a reduction in highly energetic fish larvae and Amphipoda in their diet. Other prey cannot replace these high-quality foods, with possible causes being ocean warming, decreased primary productivity, and reduced recruitment of important fish larvae.
During the last few decades, many wild Atlantic salmon populations have declined dramatically. One possible contributing factor for the decline is reduced prey availability at sea. Here, we examine post-smolt diet and investigate if post-smolts show signs of selective feeding based on 2546 post-smolts sampled from west of Ireland to the northern Norwegian Sea over a 25-year period. We also test for changes over time in stomach fullness, diet, condition factor and body length. There was a clear reduction in condition factor for post-smolts sampled in the Norwegian Sea in the period 2003-2012. The post-smolt stomach fullness was also reduced in the same period. The reduction in condition factor is partly explained by reduced stomach fullness, including a reduction of highly energetic fish larvae and Amphipoda in the diet. Feeding on other prey, such as meso-zooplankton and insects, cannot substitute the high-quality fish larvae and Amphipoda in the post-smolt diet. This is the first study to document how salmon post-smolts feeding in the Norwegian Sea are affected by reduced feeding conditions. Possible causes for the observed changes in post-smolt feeding are ocean warming, decreased primary productivity, and reduced recruitment of important fish larvae.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据