4.6 Article

A 3D PVP co-rotational formulation for large-displacement and small-strain analysis of bi-modulus materials

期刊

FINITE ELEMENTS IN ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
卷 110, 期 -, 页码 20-31

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.finel.2015.11.002

关键词

Bi-modulus materials; Bio-composites; Parametric variational principle; Quadratic programming algorithm; Convergence

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11502035, 11572060]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [106112015CDJXY320006]
  3. Open Research Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis for Industrial Equipment at Dalian University of Technology [GZ1404]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An efficient computational method is developed for large-displacement and small-strain analysis of 3D hi-modulus materials which are often found in civil, composite and biological engineering. Based on the parametric variational principle (PVP), a unified constitutive equation of 3D hi-modulus materials is proposed to deal with the problem of numerical instability. The small-strain hi-modulus problem is transformed into a standard linear complementarity problem that can be solved easily by the classic Lemke's algorithm. By using the co-rotational approach, the local PVP formulation is combined with an existing co-rotational formulation and a new tangent stiffness matrix, including a parametric variable, is derived for geometrically nonlinear analysis. Traditional stress iteration is not required for calculation of the nodal internal force when the Newton-Raphson scheme or Arc-length method is employed to solve the material and geometric nonlinear problem. Convergence of the proposed algorithm is improved greatly in contrast to the traditionally iterative solution. Also, the proposed algorithm is used to simulate a unilateral contact behavior of staggered bio-composites and the effective elasticity modulus of composites is determined accurately. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据