4.7 Article

Effects of co-pyrolysis of heavy metal contaminated biomass with magnesium carbonate on heavy metal deportment and pyrolytic product properties

期刊

FUEL
卷 294, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120545

关键词

Magnesium carbonate; Heavy metal; Phytoremediation; Biomass; Pyrolysis; Leaching

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By engineering the metal(loid)-enriched biomass with magnesium carbonate, the pyrolysis temperature can reach up to 700 ℃ with reduced environmental risks, providing a safe and value-added approach for phytoremediation residual management.
Vegetation has successfully been used for phytoremediation of heavy metal(loid) contaminated soils. Previous works found that the metal(loid)-enriched biomass can be converted into biofuels through pyrolysis. However, the potential emission of metal(loid)s at higher pyrolysis temperatures, the leaching potential of minerals in chars, and the quality of the products needs further consideration. In this work, the metal(loid)-enriched biomass was engineered by pre-mixing with magnesium carbonate to study the effect on pyrolytic product properties and metal(loid) deportment. Heavy metal contaminated mangrove grown in a land contaminated with a lead?zinc smelter slags was used as the biomass. The biomass and magnesium carbonate mixture as the feedstock was subjected to pyrolysis at temperatures from 300 to 900 ?C under the heating rate of 10 ?C/min. Results showed that the feedstock mainly decomposed at temperatures between 176 and 575 ?C. Amongst the 10 studied metal (loid)s in this work, most elements exhibited more than 70% of elemental recovery in chars at pyrolysis temperatures up to 700 ?C. Pyrolysis also enhanced heavy metal stability in chars produced at temperatures above 300 ?C. This study indicated that co-pyrolysis of heavy metal contaminated biomass with magnesium carbonate enabled the pyrolysis temperature up to 700 ?C with minimal environmental risks, providing a safe and valueadded way of phytoremediation residual management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据