4.6 Article

ON ANALYSIS OF FRACTIONAL ORDER MATHEMATICAL MODEL OF HEPATITIS B USING ATANGANA-BALEANU CAPUTO (ABC) DERIVATIVE

出版社

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S0218348X22400175

关键词

Fractional Order HBV Model; Stability Analysis; ABC Derivative; Fixed Point Theorem; Numerical Simulation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of P. R. China [11901114]
  2. Guangzhou Science and technology innovation general project [201904010010]
  3. Young innovative talents project of Guangdong Provincial Department of Education [2017KQNCX081]
  4. Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation [2019A1515011797]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Sun Yat-sen University [2021qntd21]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates a newly constructed system of equations for Hepatitis B disease using the concept of fractional order derivative. By applying well-known results of fixed point theory, the stability and qualitative analysis of the candidate solution are obtained. The results show that LADM is an efficient method for solving nonlinear problems.
The scaling exponent of a hierarchy of cities used to be regarded as a fractional. This paper investigates a newly constructed system of equation for Hepatitis B disease in sense of Atanganaa-Baleanu Caputo (ABC) fractional order derivative. The proposed approach has five distinctive quantities, namely, susceptible, acute infections, chronic infection, immunized and vaccinated populace. By applying some well-known results of fixed point theory, we find the Ulam-Hyers type stability and qualitative analysis of the candidate solution. The deterministic stability for the proposed system is also computed. We apply well-known transform due to Laplace and decomposition techniques (LADM) and Adomian polynomial for nonlinear terms for computing the series solution for the proposed model. Graphical results show that LADM is an efficient and robust method for solving nonlinear problems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据