4.6 Article

MCL1 inhibition enhances the efficacy of docetaxel against airway-derived squamous cell carcinoma cells

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL CELL RESEARCH
卷 406, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2021.112763

关键词

Lung; Squamous cell carcinoma; HARA; MCL1; Apoptosis; Docetaxel

资金

  1. JSPS [18K08151, 19K07418]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19K07418, 18K08151] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High MCL1 mRNA expression is significantly associated with shorter survival in patients with airway-derived SqCC. HARA and Detroit 562 cells, which are highly dependent on MCL1 for survival, show strong efficacy against airway-derived SqCC when treated with combined MCL1 silencing and DTX.
MCL1 is an anti-apoptotic BCL2 family member that is often overexpressed in various malignant tumors. However, few reports have described the role of MCL1 in squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) derived from airways including the lung. In this study, we examined whether MCL1 could be a novel druggable target for airwayderived SqCC, for which effective molecular targeted drugs are unavailable. We searched the Kaplan-Meier Plotter database and found that high MCL1 mRNA expression was significantly associated with shorter survival in patients with lower airway (lung) or upper airway (head and neck) derived SqCC. We also explored the Expression Atlas database and learned that authentic lung SqCC cell lines expressing both TP63 and KRT5 mRNA were extremely sparse among the publicly available lung SqCC cell lines, with an exception being HARA cells. HARA cells were highly dependent on MCL1 for survival, and MCL1-depleted cells were not able to grow, and even declined in number, upon docetaxel (DTX) exposure in vitro and in vivo. Similar in vitro experimental findings, including those in a 3D culture model, were also obtained using Detroit 562 pharyngeal SqCC cells. These findings suggested that combined treatment with MCL1 silencing plus DTX appears highly effective against airway-derived SqCC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据