4.3 Review

Update on Pharmacological Activities, Security, and Pharmacokinetics of Rhein

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2021/4582412

关键词

-

资金

  1. Regional Joint Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [U19A2010]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81891012, 82003879]
  3. Outstanding Talents Fund of Double First-Class Initiative Construction of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine [2020JCRC005, 2020QNJS002]
  4. Key Project of Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province [20ZDYF3092]
  5. Central Guided Local Special Project Southwestern Characteristic Chinese Medicine Resource Genomics Innovation Platform [2020ZYD058]
  6. Key RD Project [2018JZ0081]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rhein, as one of the main active components of rhubarb and Polygonum multiflorum, has various pharmacological effects such as cardiocerebral protective, hepatoprotective, nephroprotective, anti-inflammatory, antitumor, and antidiabetic effects. However, its poor water solubility, low bioavailability, and potential liver and kidney toxicity limit its clinical application.
Rhein, belonging to anthraquinone compounds, is one of the main active components of rhubarb and Polygonum multiflorum. Rhein has a variety of pharmacological effects, such as cardiocerebral protective effect, hepatoprotective effect, nephroprotective effect, anti-inflammation effect, antitumor effect, antidiabetic effect, and others. The mechanism is interrelated and complex, referring to NF-kappa B, PI3K/Akt/MAPK, p53, mitochondrial-mediated signaling pathway, oxidative stress signaling pathway, and so on. However, to some extent, its clinical application is limited by its poor water solubility and low bioavailability. Even more, rhein has potential liver and kidney toxicity. Therefore, in this paper, the pharmacological effects of rhein and its mechanism, pharmacokinetics, and safety studies were reviewed, in order to provide reference for the development and application of rhein.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据