4.6 Review

Prognostic factors for adverse outcomes in patients with COVID-19: a field-wide systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
卷 59, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD
DOI: 10.1183/13993003.02964-2020

关键词

-

资金

  1. Greek State Scholarships Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the prognostic factors for COVID-19 patients. The results indicated that factors such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, obstructive sleep apnoea, and pharyngalgia were associated with at least one adverse outcome. However, there were some issues identified in the risk of bias assessment.
Introduction The individual prognostic factors for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are unclear. For this reason, we aimed to present a state-of-the-art systematic review and meta-analysis on the prognostic factors for adverse outcomes in COVID-19 patients. Methods We systematically reviewed PubMed from 1 January 2020 to 26 July 2020 to identify non-overlapping studies examining the association of any prognostic factor with any adverse outcome in patients with COVID-19. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed, and between-study heterogeneity was quantified using I-2 statistic. Presence of small-study effects was assessed by applying the Egger's regression test. Results We identified 428 eligible articles, which were used in a total of 263 meta-analyses examining the association of 91 unique prognostic factors with 11 outcomes. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, obstructive sleep apnoea, pharyngalgia, history of venous thromboembolism, sex, coronary heart disease, cancer, chronic liver disease, COPD, dementia, any immunosuppressive medication, peripheral arterial disease, rheumatological disease and smoking were associated with at least one outcome and had >1000 events, p<0.005, I-2<50%, 95% prediction interval excluding the null value, and absence of small-study effects in the respective meta-analysis. The risk of bias assessment using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool indicated high risk of bias in 302 out of 428 articles for study participation, 389 articles for adjustment for other prognostic factors and 396 articles for statistical analysis and reporting. Conclusions Our findings could be used for prognostic model building and guide patient selection for randomised clinical trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据