4.2 Article

Separated interactive behaviors promote cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma game

期刊

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL B
卷 94, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1140/epjb/s10051-021-00118-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [62066045 61866039]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Yunnan Province [2019FB083]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals that when interactive diversity and identity coexist in a population, it has a negative impact on cooperation, while cooperation is improved when only interactive diversity or identity exists alone.
Interactive diversity and interactive identity are two common behavioral patterns. Interactive identity, where each individual takes identity behavior to all its neighbors, and interactive diversity, where each individual takes diversity behaviors to its different neighbors. However, most previous researches mainly focused on study these two behaviors separately. So how the cooperation dynamics will perform when two behaviors are mixed in population still needs a reasonable explanation. In this paper, we study the cooperation evolution process when players take interactive diversity and identity are mixed in population. This model is applied for prisoner dilemma game on square lattice. When studying mixed population including both interactive in various proportions we find out the damage of cooperation. On the contrary, when player taking interactive diversity or players taking interactive identity exist alone in the population cooperation will be improved. To figure out the internal dynamic, we plot different kinds of strategy pair evolution process and the distribution of strategy and player when different proportion. The results of our study reveal that for only players taking interactive diversity or identity, defectors form distinct shape of clusters, while when two typed players are mixed distribute in network, defectors will form large and connected clusters, which is the crucial to maintain existence of defectors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据