4.7 Article

Monthly river temperature trends across the US confound annual changes

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 16, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac2289

关键词

trend analysis; water quality; stream temperature; regulation; water management

资金

  1. Syracuse University CUSE grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that while most sites showed annual warming trends, these trends obscured sub-annual cooling trends at many sites. Monthly trend anomalies were spatially organized, showing persistent regional patterns at both reference and human-impacted sites.
Climate variations and human modifications of the water cycle continue to alter the Earth's surface water and energy exchanges. It is therefore critical to ascertain how these changes impact water quality and aquatic ecosystem habitat metrics such as river temperatures. Though river temperature trend analyses exist in the literature, studies on seasonal trends in river temperatures across large spatial extents, e.g. the contiguous United States (US), are limited. As we show through both annual and monthly trend analyses for 20 year (n = 138 sites) and 40 year (n = 40 sites) periods, annual temperature trends across the US mask extensive monthly variability. While most sites exhibited annual warming trends, these annual trends obscured sub-annual cooling trends at many sites. Monthly trend anomalies were spatially organized, with persistent regional patterns at both reference and human-impacted sites. The largest warming and cooling anomalies happened at human impacted sites and during summer months. Though our analysis points to coherence in trends as well as the overall impact of human activity in driving these patterns, we did not investigate the impact of river temperature observation accuracy on reported trends, an area needed for future work. Overall, these patterns emphasize the need to consider sub-annual behavior when managing the ecological impacts of river temperature throughout lotic networks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据