4.7 Article

Urinary excretion of herbicide co-formulants after oral exposure to roundup MON 52276 in rats

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
卷 197, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111103

关键词

-

资金

  1. Sustainable Food Alliance (USA)
  2. Sheepdrove Trust (UK)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A high-resolution mass spectrometry method was developed and validated to measure the urinary excretion of surfactants present in glyphosate-formulated products in rats. The method was proven to be highly accurate, precise, and reproducible, suitable for assessing the biological absorption of surfactants in experimental animals. Results showed that surfactants in glyphosate products could be readily detected in rat urine, indicating the first step towards implementing surfactant co-formulant biomonitoring in human populations.
The toxicity of surfactants, which are an integral component of glyphosate-formulated products is an underexplored and highly debated subject. Since biomonitoring human exposure to glyphosate co-formulants is considered as a public health priority, we developed and validated a high-resolution mass spectrometry method to measure the urinary excretion of surfactants present in Roundup MON 52276, the European Union (EU) representative formulation of glyphosate-based herbicides. Quantification was performed measuring the 5 most abundant compounds in the mixture. We validated the method and showed that it is highly accurate, precise and reproducible with a limit of detection of 0.0004 mu g/mL. We used this method to estimate the oral absorption of MON 52276 surfactants in Sprague-Dawley rats exposed to three concentrations of MON 52276 via drinking water for 90 days. MON 52276 surfactants were readily detected in urine of rats administered with this commercial Roundup formulation starting from a low concentration corresponding to the EU glyphosate acceptable daily intake. Our results provide a first step towards the implementation of surfactant co-formulant biomonitoring in human populations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据