4.7 Article

Comparative efficiency of green and conventional bonds pre- and during COVID-19: An asymmetric multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis

期刊

ENERGY POLICY
卷 153, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112285

关键词

Green bonds; Price efficiency; Conventional bonds; Asymmetric multifractality; COVID-19 pandemic

资金

  1. Science Foundation Ireland [16/SPP/3347]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation
  3. FEDER funds [PGC2018-093645-B-100]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the efficiency of green and conventional bond markets before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, finding increased efficiency in both markets during the outbreak. Surprisingly, green bonds showed higher efficiency during the pandemic, indicating their potential as effective diversifiers for investors in times of extreme market turmoil.
Motivated by the lack of research on price efficiency dynamics of green bonds and the impact of the COVID-19 on the pricing of fixed-income securities, this study investigates the comparative efficiency of green and conventional bond markets pre- and during the COVID-19 pandemic applying asymmetric multifractal analysis. Specifically, the multifractal scaling behaviour is examined separately during upward and downward trends in bond markets using the asymmetric multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis (A-MF-DFA) approach. The empirical findings confirm the presence of asymmetric multifractality in the green and traditional bond markets. Not surprisingly, inefficiency in both bond markets significantly escalated during the COVID-19 outbreak. Furthermore, our results indicate a higher level of efficiency of the conventional bond market over the full sample period. However, the green bond market is more efficient during a black swan event, such as the COVID-19 global pandemic, showing the potential of green bonds to become an effective diversifier for investors in traditional assets in times of extreme market turmoil. The results of the study can have important implications for investors and policymakers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据