4.7 Article

Dissociated sterol-based liver X receptor agonists as therapeutics for chronic inflammatory diseases

期刊

FASEB JOURNAL
卷 30, 期 7, 页码 2570-2579

出版社

FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL
DOI: 10.1096/fj.201600244R

关键词

LXR; traumatic brain injury; ulcerative colitis; drug discovery

资金

  1. Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America Research Fellowship Award [368561]
  2. U.S. National Institutes of Health, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences/Clinical and Translational Science Award [UL1-TR001114]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Liver X receptor (LXR), a nuclear hormone receptor, is an essential regulator of immune responses. Activation of LXR-mediated transcription by synthetic agonists, such as T0901317 and GW3965, attenuates progression of inflammatory disease in animal models. However, the adverse effects of these conventional LXR agonists in elevating liver lipids have impeded exploitation of this intriguing mechanism for chronic therapy. Here, we explore the ability of a series of sterol-based LXR agonists to alleviate inflammatory conditions in mice without hepatotoxicity. We show that oral treatment with sterol-based LXR agonists in mice significantly reduces dextran sulfate sodium colitis-induced body weight loss, which is accompanied by reduced expression of inflammatory markers in the large intestine. The anti-inflammatory property of these agonists is recapitulated in vitro in mouse lamina propria mononuclear cells, human colonic epithelial cells, and human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. In addition, treatment with LXR agonists dramatically suppresses inflammatory cytokine expression in a model of traumatic brain injury. Importantly, in both disease models, the sterol-based agonists do not affect the liver, and the conventional agonist T0901317 results in significant liver lipid accumulation and injury. Overall, these results provide evidence for the development of sterol-based LXR agonists as novel therapeutics for chronic inflammatory diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据