4.7 Article

Ciliopathy-associated IQCB1/NPHP5 protein is required for mouse photoreceptor outer segment formation

期刊

FASEB JOURNAL
卷 30, 期 10, 页码 3400-3412

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1096/fj.201600511R

关键词

Senior-LOken syndrome; nephronophthisis; Leber congenital amaurosis; nephrocystins

资金

  1. U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Eye Institute (NEI) National Research Service Award Grant [1F31EY021972-01A1]
  2. NIH NEI [EY08123, EY019298, EY014800-039003]
  3. Research to Prevent Blindness
  4. Retina Research Foundation (Houston, TX, USA)
  5. Foundation for Retina Research
  6. Nelson Trust Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Null mutations in the human IQCB1/NPHP5 (nephrocystin-5) gene that encodes NPHP5 are the most frequent cause of Senior-LOken syndrome, a ciliopathy that is characterized by Leber congenital amaurosis and nephronophthisis. We generated germline Nphp5-knockout mice by placing a -Geo gene trap in intron 4, thereby truncating NPHP5 at Leu87 and removing all known functional domains. At eye opening, Nphp5(-/-) mice exhibited absence of scotopic and photopic electroretinogram responses, a phenotype that resembles Leber congenital amaurosis. Outer segment transmembrane protein accumulation in Nphp5(-/-) endoplasmic reticulum was evident as early as postnatal day (P)6. EGFP-CETN2, a centrosome and transition zone marker, identified basal bodies in Nphp5(-/-) photoreceptors, but without fully developed transition zones. Ultrastructure of P6 and 10 Nphp5(-/-) photoreceptors revealed aberrant transition zones of reduced diameter. Nphp5(-/-) photoreceptor degeneration was complete at 1 mo of age but was delayed significantly in Nphp5(-/-);Nrl(-/-) (cone only) retina. Nphp5(-/-) mouse embryonic fibroblast developed normal cilia, and Nphp5(-/-) kidney histology at 1 yr of age showed no significant pathology. Results establish that nephrocystin-5 is essential for photoreceptor outer segment formation but is dispensable for kidney and mouse embryonic fibroblast ciliary formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据