4.6 Review

High-Frequency Oscillations and Epileptogenic Network

期刊

CURRENT NEUROPHARMACOLOGY
卷 20, 期 9, 页码 1687-1703

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1570159X19666210908165641

关键词

High-frequency oscillations; HFO network; epileptogenic network; biomarker in epilepsy; epileptogenic zone; surgery

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [XFY 81971202, 81671367, 81790653]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Epilepsy is a network disease caused by aberrant neocortical large-scale connectivity. High-frequency oscillations have been identified as a promising biomarker for assessing the severity and susceptibility of epilepsy, but their existence as a network and their relationship with the epileptogenic network are still debated.
Epilepsy is a network disease caused by aberrant neocortical large-scale connectivity spanning regions on the scale of several centimeters. High-frequency oscillations, characterized by the 80-600 Hz signals in electroencephalography, have been proven to be a promising biomarker of epilepsy that can be used in assessing the severity and susceptibility of epilepsy as well as the location of the epileptogenic zone. However, the presence of a high-frequency oscillation network remains a topic of debate as high-frequency oscillations have been previously thought to be incapable of propagation, and the relationship between high-frequency oscillations and the epileptogenic network has rarely been discussed. Some recent studies reported that high-frequency oscillations may behave like networks that are closely relevant to the epileptogenic network. Pathological high-frequency oscillations are network-driven phenomena and elucidate epileptogenic network development; high-frequency oscillations show different characteristics coincident with the epileptogenic network dynamics, and cross-frequency coupling between high-frequency oscillations and other signals may mediate the generation and propagation of abnormal discharges across the network.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据