Operating characteristics are needed to properly evaluate the scientific validity of phase I protocols
出版年份 2021 全文链接
标题
Operating characteristics are needed to properly evaluate the scientific validity of phase I protocols
作者
关键词
Clinical trials, Operating characteristics, Phase I, Protocol, Scientific validity
出版物
Contemporary Clinical Trials
Volume 108, Issue -, Pages 106517
出版商
Elsevier BV
发表日期
2021-07-25
DOI
10.1016/j.cct.2021.106517
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- A benchmark for dose-finding studies with unknown ordering
- (2020) Pavel Mozgunov et al. BIOSTATISTICS
- Designing and evaluating dose-escalation studies made easy: The MoDEsT web app
- (2019) Philip Pallmann et al. Clinical Trials
- A web tool for designing and conducting phase I trials using the continual reassessment method
- (2018) Nolan A. Wages et al. BMC CANCER
- The Impact of Early-Phase Trial Design in the Drug Development Process
- (2018) Mark R. Conaway et al. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
- Dose-finding designs for trials of molecularly targeted agents and immunotherapies
- (2017) Cody Chiuzan et al. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
- Phase 1 Trial Design: Is 3 + 3 the Best?
- (2017) Aaron R. Hansen et al. Cancer Control
- The ASA's Statement onp-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose
- (2016) Ronald L. Wasserstein et al. AMERICAN STATISTICIAN
- Statistical controversies in clinical research: early-phase adaptive design for combination immunotherapies
- (2016) N. A. Wages et al. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
- Bayesian Optimal Interval Design: A Simple and Well-Performing Design for Phase I Oncology Trials
- (2016) Y. Yuan et al. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
- Rendering the 3 + 3 Design to Rest: More Efficient Approaches to Oncology Dose-Finding Trials in the Era of Targeted Therapy
- (2016) L. Nie et al. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
- AplusB: A Web Application for Investigating A + B Designs for Phase I Cancer Clinical Trials
- (2016) Graham M. Wheeler et al. PLoS One
- Statistical controversies in clinical research: requiem for the 3 + 3 design for phase I trials
- (2015) X. Paoletti et al. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
- Scientific Review of Phase I Protocols With Novel Dose-Escalation Designs: How Much Information Is Needed?
- (2015) Alexia Iasonos et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Simple benchmark for complex dose finding studies
- (2014) Ying Kuen Cheung BIOMETRICS
- Adaptive Dose-Finding Studies: A Review of Model-Guided Phase I Clinical Trials
- (2014) Alexia Iasonos et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Calibration of prior variance in the Bayesian continual reassessment method
- (2011) Shing M. Lee et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Approaches to Phase 1 Clinical Trial Design Focused on Safety, Efficiency, and Selected Patient Populations: A Report from the Clinical Trial Design Task Force of the National Cancer Institute Investigational Drug Steering Committee
- (2010) S. P. Ivy et al. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
- Model calibration in the continual reassessment method
- (2009) Shing M Lee et al. Clinical Trials
- Dose Escalation Methods in Phase I Cancer Clinical Trials
- (2009) Christophe Le Tourneau et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- A comprehensive comparison of the continual reassessment method to the standard 3 + 3 dose escalation scheme in Phase I dose-finding studies
- (2008) Alexia Iasonos et al. Clinical Trials
- Range and trend of expected toxicity level (ETL) in standard A+B designs: A report from the children's oncology group
- (2008) Zhengjia Chen et al. Contemporary Clinical Trials
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now