4.7 Article

Coupling effect of the connected pores and pore solution on chloride ion migration in cement-based materials

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 297, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123773

关键词

Coupling effect; Connected pores; Pore solution; Chloride ion migration; Cement-based materials

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51878583, U1805253, U1905216, 51778551]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new method based on AC impedance tests was developed to determine connected pore porosity, tortuosity, and constrictivity in this study. The effects of different factors on the chloride ion migration coefficient were evaluated, with a focus on the importance of reducing connected porosity for controlling chloride ion migration.
In this study, a new method for determining the connected pore porosity, tortuosity and constrictivity was developed based on AC impedance tests. The effects of the pore factor x1, pore solution factor x2, pore-pore solution factor x3 and coupling factor x on the non-steady state chloride ion migration coef-ficient (Dm) were evaluated. The results indicated that x1, x2, x3 and any single parameter did not have good correlations with Dm, and x had an excellent linear correlation with Dm. This confirms that the coupling effect of the pores, the pore solution and their interaction control the chloride ion migration pro -cess. The contributions of x1, x2 and x3 to Dm accounted for 54.44%, 13.05%, and 31.27%, respectively. Therefore, the migration of chloride ions can be controlled to a large extent by reducing x1 and x3, which can be obtained through a reduction in the connected porosity and the accompanying reduction in S. This means that the connected pores play a decisive role in controlling the migration of chloride ions in cement-based materials, whose conductivity can be used for quickly determining the extreme value of the chlorine-related durability. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据