4.7 Article

Parametric sizing study for the design of a lightweight composite railway axle

期刊

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
卷 267, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113851

关键词

Railway axle; Lightweighting; Composite material; Unsprung mass; Composite design; NEXTGEAR

资金

  1. EU Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [S2R-OC-IP1-02-2019, 881803]
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council through the: EPSRC Future Composites Manufacturing Research Hub [EP/P006701/1]
  3. EPSRC Industrial Doctorate Centre in Composites Manufacture [EP/L015102/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigates the potential for lightweighting of railway axles to reduce the unsprung mass of a rail vehicle, thereby decreasing track damage, energy consumption, and operational costs. By focusing on the design of a composite railway axle, the research identifies the full-length pre-manufactured tube axle as the concept with the greatest potential for mass reduction, estimating a 75% reduction compared to the existing hollow steel axle.
The potential for lightweighting of railway axles was investigated to primarily reduce the unsprung mass of a rail vehicle. The reduction of unsprung mass equates to an overall lighter train which will help to reduce track damage, energy consumption and total operating costs. This work was performed within the NEXTGEAR project which is ascribed under the Shift2Rail program. This paper focusses on the design of a composite railway axle as part of the Wheelset of the future Work Package 3. A parametric study is presented for the sizing of one of the design concepts (the full-length pre-manufactured tube axle) that shows the greatest potential for mass reduction. This study uses the existing hollow steel axle as a benchmark for mass, strength and stiffness. The estimated mass of this composite axle is 50 kg. This represents an estimated mass reduction of 75% compared to the existing hollow steel axle.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据