4.6 Article

Nephrologist Follow-Up versus Usual Care after an Acute Kidney Injury Hospitalization (FUSION) A Randomized Controlled Trial

期刊

出版社

AMER SOC NEPHROLOGY
DOI: 10.2215/CJN.17331120

关键词

-

资金

  1. Kidney Research Scientist Core Education and National Training (KRESCENT) Program New Investigator Award (Kidney Foundation of Canada)
  2. Kidney Research Scientist Core Education and National Training (KRESCENT) Program New Investigator Award (Canadian Society of Nephrology)
  3. Kidney Research Scientist Core Education and National Training (KRESCENT) Program New Investigator Award (Canadian Institutes of Health Research)
  4. Innovation Fund of the Alternative Funding Plan for the Academic Health Sciences Centres of Ontario (St. Michael's Hospital)
  5. Ontario Renal Network through the Government of Ontario
  6. Innovation Fund of the Alternative Funding Plan for the Academic Health Sciences Centres of Ontario (Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to determine the feasibility of randomizing AKI survivors to early follow-up with a nephrologist or usual care, but found that many patients did not find the in-person follow-up model acceptable.
Background and objectives Survivors of AKI are at higher risk of CKD and death, but few patients see a nephrologist after hospital discharge. Our objectives during this 2-year vanguard phase trial were to determine the feasibility of randomizing survivors of AKI to early follow-up with a nephrologist or usual care, and to collect data on care processes and outcomes. Design, setting, participants, & measurements We performed a randomized controlled trial in patients hospitalized with Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) stage 2-3 AKI at four hospitals in Toronto, Canada. We randomized patients to early nephrologist follow-up (standardized basket of care that emphasized BP control, cardiovascular risk reduction, and medication safety) or usual care from July 2015 to June 2017. Feasibility outcomes included the proportion of eligible patients enrolled, seen by a nephrologist, and followed to 1 year. The primary clinical outcome was a major adverse kidney event at 1 year, defined as death, maintenance dialysis, or incident/progressive CKD. Results We screened 3687 participants from July 2015 to June 2017, of whom 269 were eligible. We randomized 71 (26%) patients (34 to nephrology follow-up and 37 to usual care). The primary reason stated for declining enrollment included hospitalization-related fatigue (n=65), reluctance to add more doctors to the health care team (n=59), and long travel times (n=40). Nephrologist visits occurred in 24 of 34 (71%) intervention participants, compared with three of 37 (8%) participants randomized to usual care. The primary clinical outcome occurred in 15 of 34 (44%) patients in the nephrologist follow-up arm, and 16 of 37 (43%) patients in the usual Care arm (relative risk, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.60 to 1.73). Conclusions Major adverse kidney events are common in AKI survivors, but we found the in-person model of follow-up posed a variety of barriers that was not acceptable to many patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据