4.7 Article

FDA Approval Summary: Pembrolizumab for the Treatment of Tumor Mutational Burden-High Solid for Tumors

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 27, 期 17, 页码 4685-4689

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-0327

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Intramural FDA HHS [FD999999] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The FDA approved pembrolizumab for the treatment of TMB-H solid tumors in adults and children, based on its significant overall response rate and duration in clinical trials. This marks the first FDA approval of a cancer treatment based on TMB, and the fourth based on a biomarker rather than primary site.
The FDA approved pembrolizumab on June 16, 2020, for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients with unresectable or metastatic tumor mutational burden-high [TMB-H; >= 10 mutations/megabase (mut/Mb)] solid tumors, as determined by an FDA-approved test, that have progressed following prior treatment and who have no satisfactory alternative treatment options. FDA granted the approval based on a clinically important overall response rate (29%; 95% confidence interval, 21-39) and duration of response (57% of responses lasting >= 12 months) in the subset of patients with TMB-H solid tumors (n = 102) spanning nine different tumor types enrolled in a multicenter single-arm trial (KEYNOTE-158). The efficacy of pembrolizumab was supported by the results of whole-exome sequencing (WES) analyses of TMB in additional patients enrolled across multiple pembrolizumab dinical trials, and a scientific understanding of the effects of PD-1 inhibition. Overall, the adverse event profile of pembrolizumab was similar to the adverse event profile observed in prior trials that supported the approval of pembrolizumab in other indications. This approval of pembrolizumab is the first time that the FDA has approved a cancer treatment for an indication based on TMB, and the fourth based on the presence of a biomarker rather than the primary site of origin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据