4.5 Review

Novel investigational drugs for constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome: a review

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON INVESTIGATIONAL DRUGS
卷 25, 期 3, 页码 275-286

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/13543784.2016.1142532

关键词

serotonin; GLP-1 analogue; guanylate cyclase C; bile acid transporter; constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome; chloride channels; cannabinoid

资金

  1. Medical University of Lodz [63/2014-2015, 502-03/1-156-04/502-14-140, 503/1-156-04/503-01]
  2. National Science Centre [UMO-2015/16/T/NZ7/00031, UMO-2013/11/N/NZ7/02354, UMO-2013/11/B/NZ7/01301, UMO-2014/13/B/NZ4/01179]
  3. Polpharma Scientific Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-C) is a functional gastrointestinal (GI) disorder with an unknown etiology. A number of the drugs tested for IBS-C have also been applied to chronic constipation and chronic idiopathic constipation. Unfortunately, due to severe adverse effects, many drugs envisioned for IBS-C had been withdrawn from the market. Nevertheless, a number of potential new agents for this indication are now under development. Areas covered: The following review describes the most recently developed agents in preclinical as well as Phase 1 and Phase 2 clinical studies. Information was obtained from published literature, abstracts and the latest results found in Clinicaltrial.gov database. The authors put a special interest on glucagon-like peptide 1 analogue, bile acid modulators, serotonergic agents, guanylate cyclase C and cannabinoid antagonists. Expert opinion: To enter the market, a newly-developed drug has to meet several criteria, such as good bioavailability or the absence of drug-related adverse events. Taking into account constipation and abdominal pain as the main symptoms in IBS-C, a novel successful drug is usually able to improve both at the same time. Four out of fifteen investigational drugs described in this paper belong to the serotonergic family and have a good prognosis to reach the market; still, more long-term clinical studies are warranted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据