4.6 Review

Hazardous gases sensors based on conducting polymer composites: Review

期刊

CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS
卷 776, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2021.138703

关键词

Conducting polymers; Hazardous gases; Gas sensors; Review

资金

  1. DST-SERB, New Delhi [EEQ/2017/000645]
  2. UGC-DAE CSR (RRCAT), Indore [CSR-IC-BL66/CRS- 183/201617/847]
  3. Inter University Accelerator Center (IUAC), New Delhi, India [62320]
  4. UGC-SAP Programme [F.530/16/DRS-I/2016 (SAP-II)]
  5. DST-FIST [SR/FST/PSI-210/2016 (C)]
  6. Rashtria Uchachatar Shiksha Abhiyan (RUSA), Government of Maharashtra

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article reviews the application of conducting polymers and their composites for detecting environmentally hazardous gases such as NH3, NO2, H2S, and CO. It comprehensively elaborates on the properties, harmfulness, and permissible exposure limits of these gases. Promising materials for selective and sensitive detection of environmentally harmful gases are discussed, along with the gas sensing mechanism of differently prepared conducting polymers and composites towards hazardous gases.
This article reviews application of conducting polymers and their composites as promising candidates for detection of the most environmentally hazardous gases, including NH3, NO2, H2S, and CO. The gases properties, harmfulness, and permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) of environmentally hazardous gases have been comprehensively elaborated. Promising materials for selective and sensitive detection of environmentally harmful gases have been reviewed in the present communication. For example, polyaniline composites are the supreme promising materials for NH3 and CO detecting while Polypyrrole, Poly (3,4-thylenedioxythiophene), and polythiophene sensors are the utmost active for NO2 and H2S monitoring, respectively. The gas sensing mechanism of differently prepared conducting polymers and its composites towards hazardous gases (viz. NH3, NO2, H2S, and CO) has also been comprehensively reviewed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据