Outcomes of mechanical circulatory support for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock
出版年份 2021 全文链接
标题
Outcomes of mechanical circulatory support for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock
作者
关键词
-
出版物
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
出版商
Wiley
发表日期
2021-06-22
DOI
10.1002/ccd.29834
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Association of Use of an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump With In-Hospital Mortality and Major Bleeding Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
- (2020) Sanket S. Dhruva et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump for Cardiogenic Shock—Reply
- (2020) Sanket S. Dhruva et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Intraaortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction
- (2019) Holger Thiele et al. CIRCULATION
- Impella Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: A Matched-Pair IABP-SHOCK II Trial 30-Day Mortality Analysis
- (2019) Benedikt Schrage et al. CIRCULATION
- Twenty-Year Trends in the Incidence and Outcome of Cardiogenic Shock in AMIS Plus Registry
- (2019) Lukas Hunziker et al. Circulation-Cardiovascular Interventions
- Temporal trends in incidence and patient characteristics in cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction from 2010 to 2017: a Danish cohort study
- (2019) Ole K.L. Helgestad et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE
- The Evolving Landscape of Impella® Use in the United States Among Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Mechanical Circulatory Support
- (2019) Amit P. Amin et al. CIRCULATION
- Analysis of outcomes for 15,259 US patients with acute myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock (AMICS) supported with the Impella device
- (2018) William W. O'Neill et al. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL
- Percutaneous short-term active mechanical support devices in cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials
- (2017) Holger Thiele et al. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
- Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump for Treating Cardiogenic Shock
- (2017) Dagmar M. Ouweneel et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
- Trends in the Use of Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices
- (2015) Rohan Khera et al. JAMA Internal Medicine
- Trends in Incidence, Management, and Outcomes of Cardiogenic Shock Complicating ST‐Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the United States
- (2014) Dhaval Kolte et al. Journal of the American Heart Association
- Percutaneous Left-Ventricular Support With the Impella-2.5–Assist Device in Acute Cardiogenic Shock
- (2012) Alexander Lauten et al. Circulation-Heart Failure
- Intraaortic Balloon Support for Myocardial Infarction with Cardiogenic Shock
- (2012) Holger Thiele et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Executive Summary
- (2011) et al. CIRCULATION
- Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation for treatment of cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis of controlled trials
- (2009) J. M. Cheng et al. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationAdd your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload Now