4.7 Article

Fast physically-based model for rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility assessment at regional scale

期刊

CATENA
卷 201, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2021.105213

关键词

Shallow slides; Rainfall; Susceptibility assessment; Physically-based model; ROC-analysis; Pyrenees

资金

  1. AEI/FEDER, UE
  2. China Scholarship Council
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for National Universities, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan)
  4. national research project called SMuCPhy - Spain Government [BIA 2015-67500-R]
  5. national research project EROSLOP - Spain Government [PID2019-104266RB-I00]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Fast Shallow Landslide Assessment Model (FSLAM) is able to calculate rainfall-induced landslide probability maps for large areas in a short amount of time. By incorporating soil properties, vegetation, elevation, and rainfall information, the model can significantly improve prediction accuracy.
Rainfall-induced landslides represent an important threat in mountainous areas. Therefore, a physically-based model called Fast Shallow Landslide Assessment Model (FSLAM) was developed to calculate large areas (>100 km(2)) with a high-resolution topography in a very short computational time. FSLAM applies a simplified hydrological model and the infinite slope theory, while the two most sensitive soil properties regarding slope stability (cohesion and friction angle) can be stochastically included. The model has five necessary input raster files including information of soil properties, vegetation, elevation and rainfall. The principal output is the probability of failure (PoF) map. The Principality of Andorra was selected as case study, where FSLAM was successfully applied and validated using the existing landslide inventory. The PoF raster file of Andorra (including 19 million cells) was calculated in only 2 min. Therefore, an accurate calibration of the input parameters was easy, which strongly improved the final outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据