4.3 Article

The effect of biosynthesized selenium nanoparticles on the expression of CYP51A and HSP90 antifungal resistance genes in Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillus flavus

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY PROGRESS
卷 38, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/btpr.3206

关键词

Aspergillus flavus; Aspergillus fumigatus; CYP51A; HSP90; selenium nanoparticles

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrated that biosynthesized selenium nanoparticles can reduce the expression levels of antifungal resistance genes in Aspergillus fumigatus and A. flavus, impacting the MIC values of these fungi.
The application of biological nanoparticles (NPs) can be considered as a way to overcome the problem of antifungal resistance in pathogenic fungi. This study takes a new approach to biosynthesized NPs influence on the expression of CYP51A and HSP90 antifungal resistance genes in Aspergillus fumigatus and A. flavus, and comparison with antifungal agents. Selenium NPs (Se-NPs) were biosynthesized using Aspergillus strains and their production was proved by several methods including, UV-Vis, XRD, FTIR, FESEM, and EDX techniques. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of Aspergillus strains were determined using the CLSI M38-A2 broth microdilution method. The differences in expression levels of CYP51A and HSP90 genes were examined between untreated and treated of A. fumigatus and A. flavus using itraconazole and amphotericin B and biosynthesized Se-NPs through real-time PCR. After confirming the results of NPs synthesis, the MIC of itraconazole and amphotericin B against A. fumigatus and A. flavus was 4 mu g/ml. Based on the real-time PCR results, the obtained increment increment CTs for these strains were -0.18, -1.46, and -1.14. Whereas the MIC values for treated samples with Se-NPs have decreased to 0.5 mu g/ml, and the increment increment CTs for these were -0.25, -1.76, and -1.68. The expression of CYP51A and HSP90 genes was significantly down-regulated through the use of Se-NPs against A. fumigatus and A. flavus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据