3.9 Article

Histological structure of duodenum in gilts receiving low doses of zearalenone and deoxynivalenol in feed

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL AND TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY
卷 68, 期 2-3, 页码 157-166

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.etp.2015.11.008

关键词

Deoxynivalenol; Zearalenone; Pig; Intestine; Histology

资金

  1. National Centre for Research and Development [R12 0080 10]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Deoxynivalenol (DON) and zearalenone (ZEN), produced by microfungi of the Fusarium family, are among the most commonly occurring mycotoxins. They are considered important factors affecting human and animal health as well as livestock productivity. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of low doses of these mycotoxins on the histological structure of the pig duodenum. The study was performed on 72 gilts, with initial weights of approximately 25 kg, divided into 4 equal groups. Group I received per os ZEN (40 mu g/kg BW), group II-DON (12 mu g/kg BW), group III ZEN (40 mu g/kg BW) and DON (12 mu gikg BW), and group IV-vehicle. The pigs were killed after 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 weeks of the treatment, and the duodenum samples were prepared for histological investigations. The slides were digitalized and subjected to morphometrical analysis. The treatment with DON and ZEN did not change the architecture of the mucosa or the ratio between goblet and adsorptive cells in the epithelium. The administration of DON induced an increase in the number of lymphocytes in the mucosal epithelium. Both mycotoxins, administered alone or together, increased the quantity of lymphocytes, plasma cells and macrophages with black-brown granules in the lamina propria. The time-courses of changes in the number of defense system cells evoked by DON and ZEN were different. In conclusion, dietary exposure to low doses of Fusarium mycotoxins should be considered an important risk factor for subclinical inflammation in the small intestine. (C) 2015 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据