4.5 Article

Free vibration of functionally graded graphene platelet-reinforced porous beams with spinning movement via differential transformation method

期刊

ARCHIVE OF APPLIED MECHANICS
卷 91, 期 12, 页码 4817-4834

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00419-021-02036-7

关键词

Spinning porous beam; Graphene platelets; Chordwise bending vibration; Flap-wise bending vibration; Differential transformation method

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11922205, 12072201]
  2. LiaoNing Revitalization Talents Program [XLYC1807026]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [N2005019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work analyzes the free vibration of a spinning functionally graded graphene platelet-reinforced metal foam beam, considering the effects of graphene platelet geometry size, types of porosity, and distributions on the vibration characteristics.
This work analyzes the free vibration of a spinning functionally graded graphene platelet-reinforced metal foam (FG-GPLRMF) beam. The differential transformation method is extended to analyze flap-wise bending vibration and chordwise bending vibration with Coriolis force effect for the first time. The beam is modeled using the Euler-Bernoulli beam theory. The Halpin-Tsai micromechanics model is utilized to predict effective material properties. Various types of graphene platelet (GPL) and porosity distributions are considered. The governing equations and corresponding boundary conditions of the FG-GPLRMF beam are obtained via Hamilton's principle. Results show that the vibration characteristics of the FG-GPLRMF beam are affected by the GPL geometry size, types of porosity, and GPL distributions. Among different types of porosity, the Porosity-A causes the highest fundamental natural frequency, while the Porosity-B corresponds to the lowest one of the spinning FG-GPLRMF beam in most cases. Moreover, the GPL pattern and porosity distribution have a coupled effect on the bending vibration of the spinning FG-GPLRMF beam.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据