4.7 Article

Systematic evaluation of a flat-heat-pipe-based thermal management: Cell-to-cell variations and battery ageing

期刊

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
卷 192, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2021.116934

关键词

Lithium-ion batteries; Cooling; Numerical modelling; Heat pipe; Statistics; Probability distribution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the temperature difference and local cell temperature in a battery pack, finding that high tolerance levels and battery ageing can lead to adverse effects on heat pipe cooling. The flat-heat-pipe-based BTM method with a high heat transfer coefficient successfully controls the temperature and temperature difference of a battery pack.
For Lithium-ion batteries, the high temperature and the high cell-to-cell temperature difference accelerates battery ageing and typically causes thermal runaway. Such temperature difference can be imposed by different parameters (such as internal resistance and polarization resistance) of every cell, so-called cell-to-cell variations. A 168-cell battery pack cooled by a flat-heat-pipe battery thermal management (BTM) method under 5C discharging rate is studied in this work. A statistical benchmark study is carried out on the cell-to-cell variations of new and aged battery packs using probability distributions. The electrical and thermal behaviours of cells were simulated using an electrical model (Simulink) and a heat transfer model (Ansys-Fluent). Results demonstrate that either of the high tolerance level and battery ageing can lead to both high local cell temperature and significant temperature difference in a battery pack. Such adverse effects may lead to the failure of heat pipe (HP) cooling. The flat-heat-pipe-based BTM method with a heat transfer coefficient of 500-2000 W/K.m(2) is successful in constraining temperature and temperature difference of a battery pack under 50 degrees C and 5 degrees C respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据