4.1 Article

SOIL QUALITY INDICATORS AND CROP YIELD UNDER LONG-TERM TILLAGE SYSTEMS

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE
卷 53, 期 4, 页码 497-511

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0014479716000521

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31171513, 41461067, 31560379]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province [145RJZA208]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Gansu Provincial Universities [037041014, 035041049]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soil quality indicators (SQI) ran be used as a synthetic tool for the assessment of the sustainability of agricultural systems. In this study we developed SQI using minimum data set (MDS) and determined the response of SQI to long-term tillage systems. Field pea (Pisum sativum L.) and spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were grown in alternate years at northwestern China, and soil attributes and crop productivity were measured 6 years after the initiation of the experiment. The MDS used to develop the SQI included soil physical (aggregate, bulk density, capillary porosity, field capacity'), chemical (soil organic matter. total nitrogen, available phosphorus, available potassium) and biological (microbial count, microbial biomass, and the activities of catalase, urease, alkaline phosphatase, and invertase) properties. All the property variables were measured in each of the 0-5, 5-10 and 10-30 cm depths and those variables that contributed significantly to the SQI were selected to be included in the MDS. Amongst the measured variables, bulk density and microbial counts occurred in the MDS of all the three depths, suggesting that these two properties are highly affected by the tillage treatments. In the long-term field experiment, the no-till with stubble covering the soil surface treatment received the greatest SQI score and achieved the highest crop yield. Soil quality under tillage systems can be assessed adequately using MDS measured at the top soil (0-5 cm) layer in rainfed agro-ecosystems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据