4.7 Article

One-step in-situ formation of TiO2 nanosheets interconnected hematite photoanode for enhanced water oxidation

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 560, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.150036

关键词

Hematite; TiO2 nanosheets; MXene; Photoelectrochemical; Water oxidation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21808090]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M651727, 2019M651719]
  3. Jiangsu University Foundation [18JDG019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a Ti3C2 MXene derived TiO2 nanosheets/hematite photoanode with interconnected structures was fabricated via a facile method. Compared to the pristine Fe2O3 film, the Fe2O3/TiO2 photoanode showed increased photocurrent density and improved performance after loading FeNiOOH cocatalyst. These improvements were attributed to facilitated charge separation and transport, accelerated OER kinetics, and the formation of interconnected structures.
In this study, by using a facile one-pot hydrothermal method, a Ti3C2 MXene derived TiO2 nanosheets/hematite photoanode with interconnected structures is fabricated via the in-situ chemical etching and exfoliation of bulk Ti3AlC2 powder. Compared to the pristine Fe2O3 film, the asobtained Fe2O3/TiO2 photoanode exhibits an increased photocurrent density of 1.72 mA cm(-2) at 1.23 V vs. RHE, and a further improved performance of 2.03 mA cm(-2) at 1.23 V vs. RHE accompanied by a cathodic shift in the onset potential are also achieved after the loading of FeNiOOH cocatalyst. Further characterizations reveal that the enhanced PEC performance of Fe2O3/TiO2 photoanode can be ascribed to the facilitated charge separation and transport as well as the accelerated OER kinetics owing to the decoration of TiO2 nanosheets and the formation of interconnected structures. This study provides a favorable route for effectively improving the PEC activity of hematite photoanode, and also promotes the application of Ti3C2 MXene in solar water splitting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据