4.7 Article

Attribute reduction methods in fuzzy rough set theory: An overview, comparative experiments, and new directions

期刊

APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING
卷 107, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107353

关键词

Fuzzy rough set theory; Attribute reduction; Dependency; Uncertainty measure; Discernibility matrix

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61976182, 62076171, 61876157, 61976245]
  2. Key Techniques of Integrated Operation and Maintenance for Urban Rail Train Dispatching Control System based on Artificial Intelligence [2019YFH0097]
  3. Sichuan Key RD project [2020YFG0035]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigated attribute reduction methods in fuzzy rough set theory, comparing and analyzing three different types of reduction rules through experiments, which can retain fewer attributes while improving or maintaining the classification accuracy of a classifier. Furthermore, some new research directions were discussed.
Fuzzy rough set theory is a powerful tool to deal with uncertainty information, which has been successfully applied to the fields of attribute reduction, rule extraction, classification tree induction, etc. In order to comprehensively investigate attribute reduction methods in fuzzy rough set theory, this paper first briefly reviews the related concepts of fuzzy rough set theory. Then, all methods are summarized through six different aspects including data sources, preprocessing methods, fuzzy similarity metrics, fuzzy operations, reduction rules, and evaluation methods. Among them, reduction rules are reviewed in three categories, i.e., fuzzy dependency-based, fuzzy uncertainty measure-based, and fuzzy discernibility matrix-based. These three types of reduction rules are compared and analyzed through experiments. The experimental results clarify that these three reduction rules can retain fewer attributes and improve or maintain the classification accuracy of a classifier. Moreover, the statistical hypothesis test is conducted to evaluate the statistical difference of these methods. The results show that these algorithms are statistically significantly different. Finally, some new research directions are discussed. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据