4.5 Article

Genomic imprinting, disrupted placental expression, and speciation

期刊

EVOLUTION
卷 70, 期 12, 页码 2690-2703

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/evo.13085

关键词

Gene expression; hybridization; hybrid inviability; Phodopus

资金

  1. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health [R01HD073439]
  2. National Science Foundation [DEB-1406754]
  3. University of Montana
  4. Society for the Study of Evolution's Rosemary Grant Award
  5. David Nicholas Memorial Fund
  6. M. J. Murdock Charitable Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The importance of regulatory incompatibilities to the early stages of speciation remains unclear. Hybrid mammals often show extreme parent-of-origin growth effects that are thought to be a consequence of disrupted genetic imprinting (parent-specific epigenetic gene silencing) during early development. Here, we test the long-standing hypothesis that abnormal hybrid growth reflects disrupted gene expression due to loss of imprinting (LOI) in hybrid placentas, resulting in dosage imbalances between paternal growth factors and maternal growth repressors. We analyzed placental gene expression in reciprocal dwarf hamster hybrids that show extreme parent-of-origin growth effects relative to their parental species. In massively enlarged hybrid placentas, we observed both extensive transgressive expression of growth-related genes and biallelic expression of many genes that were paternally silenced in normal sized hybrids. However, the apparent widespread disruption of paternal silencing was coupled with reduced gene expression levels overall. These patterns are contrary to the predictions of the LOI model and indicate that hybrid misexpression of dosage-sensitive genes is caused by other regulatory mechanisms in this system. Collectively, our results support a central role for disrupted gene expression and imprinting in the evolution of mammalian hybrid inviability, but call into question the generality of the widely invoked LOI model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据