4.7 Article

Liver Venous Deprivation or Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy? A Retrospective Multicentric Study

期刊

ANNALS OF SURGERY
卷 274, 期 5, 页码 874-880

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005121

关键词

extended hepatectomy; liver venous deprivation; radiological simultaneous porto-hepatic embolization; remnant liver volume

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared the effects of simultaneous portal vein embolization and hepatic vein embolization techniques on remnant liver hypertrophy in candidates for extended hepatectomy, specifically LVD and ALPPS procedures. Results showed that ALPPS led to faster hypertrophy and higher successful resection rates compared to LVD. While LVD had advantages in terms of operative duration, blood losses, and length-of-stay, ALPPS demonstrated potential benefits in patient management.
Objective: To compare 2 techniques of remnant liver hypertrophy in candidates for extended hepatectomy: radiological simultaneous portal vein embolization and hepatic vein embolization (HVE); namely LVD, and ALPPS. Background: Recent advances in chemotherapy and surgical techniques have widened indications for extended hepatectomy, before which remnant liver augmentation is mandatory. ALPPS and LVD typically show higher hypertrophy rates than portal vein embolization, but their respective places in patient management remain unclear. Methods: All consecutive ALPPS and LVD procedures performed in 8 French centers between 2011 and 2020 were included. The main endpoint was the successful resection rate (resection rate without 90-day mortality) analyzed according to an intention-to-treat principle. Secondary endpoints were hypertrophy rates, intra and postoperative outcomes. Results: Among 209 patients, 124 had LVD 37 [13,1015] days before surgery, whereas 85 underwent ALPPS with an inter-stages period of 10 [6, 69] days. ALPPS was mostly-performed for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), LVD for CRLM and perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Hypertrophy was faster for ALPPS. Successful resection rates were 72.6% for LVD +/- rescue ALPPS (n = 6) versus 90.6% for ALPPS (P < 0.001). Operative duration, blood losses and length-of-stay were lower for LVD, whereas 90-day major complications and mortality were comparable. Results were globally unchanged for CRLM patients, or after excluding the early 2 years of experience (learning-curve effect). Conclusions: This study is the first 1 comparing LVD versus ALPPS in the largest cohort so far. Despite its retrospective design, it yields original results that may serve as the basis for a prospective study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据