4.8 Article

Fabrication of Integrated Copper-Based Nanoparticles/Amorphous Metal-Organic Framework by a Facile Spray-Drying Method: Highly Enhanced CO2 Hydrogenation Activity for Methanol Synthesis

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 60, 期 41, 页码 22283-22288

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202110585

关键词

amorphous metal-organic frameworks; CO2 hydrogenation; copper; heterogeneous catalysis; zinc oxide

资金

  1. NEDO
  2. JST PRESTO [JPMJPR1514]
  3. JSPS [17750056]
  4. Advanced Characterization Platform of the Nanotechnology Platform Japan - Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [JPMXP09-A-19-KU-0292]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17750056] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Cu/amUiO-66 and Cu-ZnO/amUiO-66 catalysts, prepared via spray-drying method, demonstrated high catalytic activity in CO2 hydrogenation to methanol, showing significant improvement compared to other catalysts.
We report on Cu/amUiO-66, a composite made of Cu nanoparticles (NPs) and amorphous [Zr6O4(OH)(4)(BDC)(6)] (amUiO-66, BDC=1,4-benzenedicarboxylate), and Cu-ZnO/amUiO-66 made of Cu-ZnO nanocomposites and amUiO-66. Both structures were obtained via a spray-drying method and characterized using high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, energy dispersive spectra, powder X-ray diffraction and extended X-ray absorption fine structure. The catalytic activity of Cu/amUiO-66 for CO2 hydrogenation to methanol was 3-fold that of Cu/crystalline UiO-66. Moreover, Cu-ZnO/amUiO-66 enhanced the methanol production rate by 1.5-fold compared with Cu/amUiO-66 and 2.5-fold compared with gamma-Al2O3-supported Cu-ZnO nanocomposites (Cu-ZnO/gamma-Al2O3) as the representative hydrogenation catalyst. The high catalytic performance was investigated using in situ Fourier transform IR spectra. This is a first report of a catalyst comprising metal NPs and an amorphous metal-organic framework in a gas-phase reaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据