4.6 Article

Genomic Correlates to the Newly Proposed Grading Prognostic Groups for Prostate Cancer

期刊

EUROPEAN UROLOGY
卷 69, 期 4, 页码 557-560

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.10.040

关键词

Gleason grading; Prostate cancer; Genomics; Precision medicine; Active surveillance; Risk

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recommendations by the International Society of Urologic Pathology and 2016 World Health Organization blue book propose the use of a five-tiered prostate cancer (PCa) grading system. The five prognostic grade groupings (PGGs) ranging from 1 to 5 are defined as Gleason grades <= 6, 3 + 4, 4 + 3, 8, and > 8, respectively. Recent work suggests that each group is associated with a distinct risk of biochemical PCa recurrence. In this study, we sought genomic support for PGGs using whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing data for 426 clinically localized PCas treated by radical prostatectomy. After adjustment for tumor purity for the sequencing data, we observed a significant frequency increase in genomic amplifications and deletions (p = 0.013) and in nonsynonymous point mutations (p = 0.008) with increasing risk group. Interestingly, PGG1 (low risk) was entirely haploid, whereas PGG2-5 exhibited increasing polyploidy frequency. Principal component analysis of genomic profiles revealed that PGG1, PGG2, and PGG3 represent distinct classes, but PGG4 and PGG5 exhibit genomic similarity. Together, these observations for the largest PCa genomic data set to date provide support for increasing genomic alterations with increasing PGG. This is the first genomic correlation of the PGG system. Future work will need to explore the clinical utility of PGGs in prospective studies with long-term follow-up. (C) 2015 European Association of Urology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据